« What's New? Stu & The Dude's Weekend Wrap-Up: "Miami Vice" and "John Tucker," It's Hot Out Here, and "What Time Does the Carnival Start?" | Main | What's New? Setting Up a MySpace Page Leads to Lots of Dilemmas, and Some WKRP Reminiscing. »
August 2, 2006
Four Syllables and Two Words that Equal "Janet Jackson," and "Chicago's Katrina."
By:
The Dude on the Right
Maybe it's time I finally just do some investing for our podcasts, and I suppose
even my blogs, and just buy a dozen VCR's or TIVO's, so I can start recording
all kinds of the funny/bizarre/inane things people say when they are on TV.
My latest case for this happened yesterday when, as I was getting ready to get
out of the door, I heard some dude, on the news, proclaim that with the
power-outage they were having in the neighborhood, and it being really hot here
in Chicago, that this was Chicago's "Katrina." Hmm? Let's see?
It was around 7 in the morning, the power went out the night before around 7,
and the City of Chicago and ComEd seemed to quickly step-up and start making
sure the elderly were cared for, that people were able to get plenty of free
water, and, well, you could also find locals stores outside the power outage
zone (it's not like it was the entire city), and buy water, in an
air-conditioned building. I have a feeling some actual Katrina survivors
would have a few words for this dude, and I wouldn't even hold it against them
if they took his free water.
But this blog isn't about my need to invest in the web site, this blog is really about two words, totaling four syllables, and those equating to:
Janet Jackson
Why would I even mention her name when I blame her for the advancement of many of our censorship woes today? I mention her name because there was a news segment on our local news, that Janet Jackson was in Chicago, promoting something I hope no one buys, and the segment wanted me to just pull out my hair, throw the TV out of the window, and then go outside, watch out for the broken glass, pick-up my TV, bring it back inside, and pray it wasn't broken so I could watch some gratuitous violence, gratuitous laughs, and gratuitous nudity on one of my cable channels. Or at least be able to watch Howard TV.
But getting back to the news' segment.
So our local station sent a reporter to this press conference of Janet's, and the reporter quickly stated that Janet would answer questions about anything. Here's what the segment reporter found to be "questions about anything:"
- A question about the new CD
- A question about working with Nelly
- A question about gaining 60 pounds for a movie that was never made and how that felt.
- A question about how the 40 year old dudette has survived over the years.
I will give these admissions, that the reporter they sent to the press conference isn't one to usually be confrontational, so I don't see her ever asking questions that might be controversial, at least to Janet Jackson. I also was not present for the press conference, so if someone was there, asking the hard-hitting questions, and Janet Jackson was actually answering "questions about anything," I haven't heard them yet, but here are some of the questions I would have like to have asked her, although I probably would have chickened out in a room full of people and just asked something like "Who influences you in your music today?" I guess I would be better off sending our crack interviewer, Stu Gotz, to ask questions like:
- How do you feel knowing that your actions at the Super Bowl have created the excuse the government was looking for to start censoring what we hear and see on radio and television?
- Janet, this is a multi-part question: What's with the "Wardrobe Malfunction?" Who's fault was it, really? Was it the seamstress? Was it Justin Timberlake and his incredibly strong forearms? If you planned it, did you really think that "Star" piercing would suppress the masses about nudity? And couldn't you have ditched the piercing so we would have seen what most of us have been dreaming to see since that "Rolling Stone" cover many years back?
- My father always said that women are more sexually mysterious with their clothes on because you have to imagine them naked, so why did you ruin our imaginations by popping out your boob at the Super Bowl?
- Since the "Wardrobe Malfunction" wasn't your fault, and if your personal seamstress was involved in making your dress at the Super Bowl, or even if not, have you either fired them, or made sure whomever it was, would never work as a seamstress again, because they have ruined, for all of the rest of us, our radio and television viewing pleasure?
- After you gained about 30 pounds, why didn't you go to these film folks and ask them if you really needed to add another 30 pounds for the film? And I read that Mariah Carey has gotten your role. She's got a concert tour coming up, and I don't think she will be gaining 60 pounds anytime soon. Did they change the role for her? And why not you?
- What the hell were you thinking letting Justin grab your boob? Do you know where his hands have been?
I'm pretty sure, with any of those questions, "Questions about anything" wouldn't really hold up for me, or even Stu, at that press conference. But for all of these years, and I'm sorry, but unless some person stitching her outfit had it in for everyone, someone really knows why Janet Jackson really had her "Wardrobe Malfunction," and go ahead, call me an idiot, but I still think Janet really knows. The thing is, that if she really was involved, and she just stepped up and said "I planned it, the TV folks had no idea, because I wanted to make a statement about..." whatever, government censorship might have a few more troubles getting things as laws, and she probably could have spinned the entire incident as a cheerleader for being a daring dudette. Her actions, for whatever reason, and whomever let/made it happen, our world has changed where people are clamoring for the government to protect our children. Our government should be there to protect our children in times of war. Our government should be there to protect our children from criminals. But it should always be the role of the parent to protect our children from radio and TV by doing one of two things - turning it off or changing the channel. Sure, the Janet Jackson boob thing happened so fast, so maybe those options don't totally apply, but my parents would have at least had the balls to say something like, if we had even noticed her boob, "grabbing a girls bra isn't appropriate like he did, so don't do that." Sometimes lessons need to be learned by watching TV, and most of the times, it should be our parents teaching those lessons.
Parents have a job to do, and for the sake of our country, they had better stop trying to make the government do their job.
And Janet Jackson I'm sorry, but until you come totally clean on this issue, I can't support you, or your music projects.
That’s it for this one! I’m The Dude on the Right!! L8R!!!
Posted by Rightdude at August 2, 2006 9:46 PM
Comments
Don't you think it's about time to get over the Superbowl incident, whether planned or not, it's in the past. I think there are far more worse things on tv than a woman's boob. It amazes me how hypocritical american's are, for example, it's okay for children to see people blowing up other people, having sex on tv (even just the hint of sex is enough, children are not stupid), and drug addicts taking hits on television, but a woman's boob well that is the end of the world. How about children seeing, hundreds of people being left to die i.e. hurricane katrina, but a woman's boob is just unthinkable. I wish America would ask themselves would the reaction had been the same if it had been Madonna or Britney Spears, I think not.
Posted by: Chad at August 3, 2006 7:38 AM
